4BU016 Sustainable Business CW Report Assignment Brief Semester 1 and 2 2026 | UOW
Assignment Brief 4BU016 Sustainable Business 25/26
Topic | Detail |
Academic year / semester | 2025/2026 Semester 1 and 2 |
Module code and title | 4BU016 The Sustainable Business |
Module Leader | Katie Brookes katie.brookes@wlv.ac.uk |
Assignment name | Coursework |
Assignment type | Report |
Assignment weighting and size | 100% 3000 words (+/-10%) |
Assessment unpacking video location | Modules > Assessment > Assessment Information |
‘What’s my assignment?’ unpacking date | Week 1 repeated week 4. |
Formative submission date | See Canvas front page |
Formative submission method | Upload to Canvas- see Assignment Tab in Canvas for details |
Formative feedback date | To be discussed in class |
Summative (i.e., final) submission date | See Canvas front page and Assignment Tab |
Summative submission method | Online in Canvas |
Assignment requirements | This assessment requires you to choose ANY ONE of the following United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, you will then choose ANY ONE for-profit organisation and provide detailed information of your chosen organisations sustainability practice(s) in relation to the selected theme. |
The assessment requires you to choose ANY ONE of the following themes from the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals and write a 3000-word report. The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals can be accessed here: https://sdgs.un.org/goals Theme 1: Affordable and Clean Energy (Goal 7) Theme 2: Decent Work and Economic Growth (Goal 8) Theme 3: Sustainable Cities and Communities (Goal 11) Theme 4: Responsible Consumption and Production (Goal 12) Theme 5: Climate Action (Goal 13) Theme 6: Life Below Water (Goal 14) The 3000-word report should include the following: A. Executive summary (300 words) – This is not included in the word count. For the executive summary, you will provide a brief snapshot of the entire report. This should include: – A brief introduction of the chosen theme (100 words) – A brief introduction of the chosen organisation, it’s sustainability vision and mission (150 words) – Sustainability theories used (50 words) B. Introduction to Sustainability theme (600 words) For this section, you will provide an overview of the chosen sustainability theme. This should include: – Brief description of the theme (150 words) – Key issues associated with the theme and its impact across the globe (450 words) C. Organisation (1000 words) For this section, you will choose any one for-profit organisation and provide detailed information of your chosen organisations’ sustainability practice(s) in relation to the selected theme. This should include: – Sustainability actions/practices that the organisation adopts to resolve the issues you identified for the chosen theme (500 words) – How the noted sustainability practices(s) impact the social(people), environmental(planet) and economic(profit) performance (500 words) D. Exploration of theory (1000 words) – For this section, you will select at least two models (in relation to the business functions) that can support your chosen organisation and resolve issues you identified as part of the chosen theme. This should include: – A brief description of selected model E.g., sustainable marketing or sustainable HR or sustainable finance or sustainable supply chain management. (300 words) – Clear justification of how the research gathered can add further value in supporting the organisation to resolve issues in relation to chosen theme (700 words) E. Recommendation (400 words) Based on your findings from theory, provide recommendations on how your chosen organisation can improve or develop their sustainability practices. Proposed report structure: 1. Front page Include student number, chosen theme and module tutor name. 2. Executive summary (300 words) – This is not included in the word count. 3. Name of chosen theme (600 words) 4. Name of chosen organisation (1000 words 5. Exploration of theory (1000 words) 6. Recommendation (400 words) 7. Reference List 8. Appendices Further instructions: – Please start each section on a new page – Use font size 11, font – Arial or Calibri | |
Learning outcomes | LO1- Demonstrate an understanding of sustainability within a range of business environments. LO2- Demonstrate an understanding of the Triple Bottom Line. LO3- Develop a sustainability plan for an organisation. |
Assessment criteria | · Exploration of sustainability theme/concepts- 20%. · Assessment of sustainability practice and its impact- 30%. · Theoretical analysis of sustainability concepts- 30%. · Recommendations- 10%. · Academic writing, references, clear and cohesive report- 10%. |
Characteristics of a good submission | Shows understanding of the chosen theme. Clear knowledge for the chosen organisation including its current sustainability practice(s). Analyse at least two theoretical concepts that support the organisation and theme. Provide a number of recommendations appropriate for the organisation. Use books and journal articles to support your work as well as a range of wider reading. |
Additional instructions | Reference list and appendices are NOT included in the word count. Always keep a copy of your drafts and a file of working documents. There may be circumstances – for example, if there are questions relating to the academic integrity of your work – where you may be asked to submit the evidence of your work and meet with your tutor to answer questions about your submission. |
Professional Body requirements | (If applicable) |
University regulations | University’s Academic Regulations Academic Integrity Policy Level and Mark Descriptors |
Support | Student Support and Wellbeing Study Guides Skills for Learning – Introduction to Academic Study Skills Academic English Language Skills You should also refer to your Course and Module Guides |
Date by which feedback will be provided | Within the University of Wolverhampton current guidelines. |
Feedback format | Written feedback on Canvas |
Resit details | The Resit requirement for this assignment is to provide a rework of the original submission, with additions and amendments highlighted, to indicate where you have applied the feedback received. The resit will be due in the resit period and the actual date will be available on Canvas approximately 6 weeks after the submission for the first assessment submission. |
Are You Looking Answer for GMGT 5173 Organisational Behaviour Assignment?
Request to Buy Answer
Report criteria | 80-100% Work of an excellent standard | 70-79% Work of a very good standard |
60-69% Work of a good standard. |
50-59% Work of a satisfactory standard. | 40-49% Work of a pass standard. | 0-39% FAIL |
Exploration of sustainability theme/concepts (20%)
| The work demonstrates excellent exploration of chosen sustainability theme, underpinning the value and key components of the theme. A balanced, excellently structured piece of work that is consistent and demonstrates an excellent understanding of concepts within the theme. | The work demonstrates very good exploration of chosen sustainability theme, underpinning the value and key components of the theme. A balanced, very well- structured piece of work that is consistent and demonstrates a very good understanding of concepts within the theme. | The work demonstrates good exploration of chosen sustainability theme, underpinning the value and key components of the theme. A well- structured piece of work that is mostly consistent and demonstrates an overall good understanding of concepts within the theme. | The work demonstrates satisfactory exploration of chosen sustainability theme, underpinning some values and key components of the theme. A satisfactorily structured piece of work that is consistent in parts and demonstrates satisfactory understanding of concepts within the theme. Possible diversions from chosen theme of discussion | The work demonstrates a fair exploration of chosen sustainability theme, only partially underpinning values and key components of the theme. The work diverges from chosen theme in parts and demonstrates inconsistencies in understanding of key concepts within the theme. | The work fails to explore the chosen sustainability theme, thus failing to meet the assessment criteria. Uses inaccurate or inappropriate |
Assessment of sustainability practices and for selected organisation and its impact on 3Ps (30%)
| Excellent assessment of sustainability practices of the selected organisation in line with the chosen theme. The correlation between the theme, sustainability practice(s) and its impact on 3Ps is presented at an excellent standard. | Very good assessment of sustainability practices of the selected organisation in line with the chosen theme. The correlation between the theme, sustainability practice(s) and its impact on 3Ps is presented at a very good standard. . | Good assessment of sustainability practices of the selected organisation in line with the chosen theme. The correlation between the theme, sustainability practice(s) and its impact on 3Ps is presented mostly at a good standard. | Satisfactory assessment of sustainability practices of the selected organisation mostly in line with the chosen theme. Possible diversion from chosen theme. The correlation between the theme, sustainability practice(s) and its impact on 3Ps is presented at a satisfactory standard with some inconsistencies. | Partial assessment of sustainability practices of the selected organisation in relation to chosen theme. Possible diversion from chosen theme or partial information presented. The correlation between the chosen theme, sustainability practice(s) and its impact on 3Ps is presented at a fair standard but demonstrates frequent inconsistencies. | The work fails to clearly assess the sustainability practices of the selected organisation, or the assessment is mostly inaccurate. The work lacks coherence between chosen theme, sustainability practice(s) and its impact on 3Ps, thus failing to meet the assignment criteria. |
Theoretical analysis of sustainability concepts (30%)
| Strong evidence of wider reading (beyond sources shared on Canvas) of sustainability theory and literature from credible sources. Excellent appraisal of appropriate theory around chosen theme. Excellent analysis of how theory aligns with sustainability practices of selected organisation. | Very good evidence of wider reading (beyond sources shared on Canvas) of sustainability theory and literature from credible sources. Very good appraisal of appropriate theory around chosen theme. Very good analysis of how theory aligns with sustainability practices of selected organisation. | Good evidence of reading of sustainability theory and literature from credible sources. Appraisal of appropriate theory around chosen theme is mostly good. Analysis of how theory aligns with sustainability practices of selected organisation is mostly good. | Satisfactory evidence of reading of sustainability theory and literature from credible sources, possibly non-credible sources (blogs, Wikipedia) Satisfactory appraisal of appropriate theory around chosen theme. Possible inconsistency in theory selection and appraisal. Satisfactory analysis of how theory aligns with sustainability practices of selected organisation. | Some evidence of reading of sustainability theory and literature from credible sources as well as non-credible sources (blogs, Wikipedia) Lack of clarity in appraisal of appropriate theory around chosen theme. Incomplete analysis of how theory aligns with sustainability practices of selected organisation | No evidence of reading of sustainability concepts. Possible evidence of sustainability concepts from non-credible sources or inaccurate theory selection. Minimal to no demonstration of appraisal of chosen theory and lacks analysis of how theory aligns with sustainability practices of selected organisation. Possible mismatch between theory and organisation sustainability practices |
Recommendation (10%)
| The work provides a strong and logical recommendation based on gaps identified between selected organisation’s sustainability practice(s) and theory presented as part of the report. Provides excellent evidence to support the recommendation. | The work provides a very good and logical recommendation based on gaps identified between selected organisation’s sustainability practice(s) and theory presented as part of the report. Provides very good evidence to support the recommendation | The work provides a good recommendation; mostly logical and based on gaps identified between selected organisation’s sustainability practice(s) and theory presented as part of the report. Provides mostly good evidence to support the recommendation. | The work provides a satisfactory recommendation. Possible lack of clarity and/or minor errors in bridging the gaps identified between selected organisation’s sustainability practice(s) and theory presented as part of the report. Provides valid evidence to support the recommendation but with minor errors. | The work provides a recommendation; but lacks clear justification on how it bridges the gaps identified between selected organisation’s sustainability practice(s) and theory presented as part of the report. Provides some evidence to support the recommendation. | The works fails to provide a recommendation or recommendation provided has possibly very little or no link to the organisation’s sustainability practice(s) and theory presented as part of the report; thus, failing to meet the assessment criteria |
Academic writing/References (10%)
| The work is excellently presented and free of spelling and/or typographical errors. Excellent application of Harvard referencing system. | The work is well presented and largely or wholly free of spelling and/or typographical errors. Very good, possibly faultless application of Harvard referencing system. | Overall, the work is well-presented with some minor errors in referencing or grammar. Good application of Harvard referencing system. | The work is cohesive but may be hindered by inappropriate balance, structure or writing style. Some minor repeated errors in referencing or grammar. | The work is possibly lacking in balance, structure or writing style and consists of repeated errors in referencing and/or grammar. |
