NAM7132-25WIN Innovation and Social Impact in Public Health Assignment Brief 2026 | BN Published: 16 Mar, 2026 Category Assignment Subject Nursing University Buckinghamshire New University Module Title NAM7132-25WIN Innovation and Social Impact in Public Health Word Count 1000 Words Assessment Type Portfolio NAM7132-25WIN Assignment Brief Assignment No. and type:
CW1: Portfolio
Assessment weighting:
100%
Submission time and date:
Thursday 19 March 2026 before 14.00
Target feedback time and date:
Monday 13 April 2026 at 14.00
NAM7132-25WIN Assignment Task CW1: Portfolio of Evidence
For the assessment of this module, you are required to create a portfolio of evidence that showcases your understanding of the critical role of social impact and the need for innovation in public health. Your portfolio will display your progress, insights, and tangible applications associated with the four learning outcomes of this module.
The portfolio should be divided into the following pages:
- Welcome:
Write an introduction naming yourself and offering a welcome greeting. Following this, you may wish to identify the purpose of your portfolio and then explain to the reader how the portfolio may be navigated.
- Exploring Social Impact: a. Develop an infographic that illustrates your understanding of the value of social impact within society in the context of Public Health. The infographic should effectively convey information, data, and concepts related to social impact and its importance for public health. You may design the infographic using appropriate visuals, icons, graphs, or any other relevant elements. Include references to acknowledge your sources.
b. You are encouraged to include various artefacts such as research studies, case examples, policy documents, practical applications, or visual aids that will enhance and complement your infographic. Explain how these artefacts are linked to LO1.
- Innovation in Public Health Projects:
a. Choose a public health intervention and create a visual flowchart illustrating the key steps involved in its planning and implementation. In your portfolio, include comments alongside each step, discussing the role and importance of innovation, as well as any potential limitations that may arise in the absence of innovation. Include references to acknowledge your sources.
b. You are encouraged to include various artefacts such as research studies, case examples, policy documents, practical applications, or visual aids that will enhance and complement your flowchart. Explain how these artefacts are linked to LO2.
- Developing an Innovative Idea:
a. Write a 1000-word proposal presenting an innovative project or product that addresses a public health issue and has the potential to generate a positive social impact. In your proposal, you should:
Outline the aim of your project or product, identifying the public health issue it is intended to address. Describe the methodology involved in realising your project or product. This should provide an insight into how your idea will transition from concept to reality. Consider any ethical implications. Detail the potential social impact of your project or product. This section should demonstrate how your initiative will contribute to improving public health and the broader societal benefits that could arise. Include references to acknowledge your sources. b. You are encouraged to include various artefacts such as research studies, case examples, policy documents, practical applications, or visual aids that will enhance and complement your proposal and the potential impact of your idea. Explain how these artefacts are linked to LO3.
- Personal and Professional Development Reflection: a. Create a visual timeline of your journey and progression as an innovator in public health. This chronological timeline should capture key moments, learnings, and achievements that have contributed to your development, not only during your studies but throughout your professional and lifelong practice. Write reflective comments that accompany these points in time and use references to acknowledge your sources if appropriate.
b. You are encouraged to include various artefacts such as reflections on coursework, evidence of participation in workshops or conferences, podcasts listened to, and documentation of learning opportunities that will enhance and complement your timeline. Explain how these artefacts are linked to LO4.
If you are registered with the Disability and Inclusion Services or have a disability, please contact your module leader to discuss how your reasonable adjustments will be applied to this assignment.
Getting Support for Your Assignment
Your first point of advice should be to the person setting the assignment or the module leader.
If you need more general support with your studies (e.g. academic writing, referencing, critical thinking) then the Student Learning and Achievement Team can support the development of your academic skills.
This assignment has been designed to provide you with an opportunity to demonstrate your achievement of the following module learning outcomes:
LO1. Critically explore the value of social impact within society. LO2. Systematically evaluate the need for innovation when leading public health projects. LO3. Create and develop an innovative idea in order to demonstrate a positive social impact within an aspect of public health. LO4. Critically reflect on personal and professional development as an innovator in public health.
Practicalities: Referencing, presenting and submitting your work
To complete the assessment for this module, a mark of 50% or higher is required. You are strongly advised to refer to the Assessment Criteria at the end of this Assignment Brief.
For the development of your portfolio, you are required to use a ready-made template available in the Blackboard Portfolio tool. Detailed instructions for accessing and completing the template are provided in the Assessment Information folder on Blackboard.
Before submitting your work to Turnitin, you need to share a snapshot of your completed portfolio with the assessors. Guidance on this process will be issued in due course via a Blackboard announcement.
For the Turnitin submission, you are required to compile the following portfolio components into a single Word document:
the infographic, the flowchart, the 1,000-word project proposal, and the visual timeline. Presentation and referencing:
Present your Word document in Arial font, size 12, 1.5 line spacing, with page numbers. Include a cover page with your name, surname, student cohort, module code and title, and the submission date. Declare the word count for the project proposal. The word limit is 1000±10% (i.e., 900-1100 words). Use in-text citations and provide a full reference list at the end of the Word document. Referencing should be in accordance with the Harvard System as defined in Cite Them Right. As a general rule, there should be between 8 and 12 references for every 1000 words. This number, however, is indicative and dependent on the number of arguments presented and the number of readings you use. Submission Details
A Word document (.docx) containing all required portfolio components should be submitted via the relevant Turnitin submission point on Blackboard. Sharing a snapshot of your completed portfolio just before uploading your work to Turnitin is also mandatory. You can submit your work as many times as you like before the submission date. If you do submit your work more than once, your earlier submission will be replaced by the most recent version. Once you have submitted your work, ensure you keep a digital receipt as proof of submission for future reference, along with the original electronic copy of your assignment. Please note that work that is submitted up to 10 working days beyond the submission date will be considered a late submission. Late submissions will be marked and the actual mark recorded, but will be capped at the pass mark (50%), provided that the work is of a passing standard. Work submitted after this period will not be marked and will be treated as a non-submission. Should you consider personal circumstances prevent you from submitting your work, please review the guidance set out on the BNU web pages regarding a deadline extension or mitigating circumstances claim. You can also seek support from the Students’ Union Advice Centre. Confidentiality
You should maintain and respect confidentiality in relation to the protection of personal, technical and/or commercial information of a sensitive nature in your assessed work.
Please adhere to the University’s confidentiality policy and not identify any individuals or institutions unless the information is available within the public domain.
For further information and guidance, please see the University Academic Confidentiality guidance.
NAM7132-25WIN Innovation and SI in PH Assignment
Pay & Buy Non- Plagiarised Assignment Academic Integrity
Academic integrity means taking responsibility for your own work and not acting in a way to give you an unfair advantage over another learner. This includes writing in your own words and acknowledging sources you have used. It also covers the appropriate use of Artificial Intelligence. When you submit an assignment, you are making a declaration that it is your own work and that you have acknowledged the contribution of others and their ideas in its development (for example, by referencing them appropriately).
For further information, please see the following student-facing guidance on the University website:
BNU Student Academic Integrity Guidance BNU Artificial Intelligence Guidance for Students
There are also links to resources to support your understanding of Academic Integrity within your Blackboard module sites in the Assessment Information area.
Assessment Criteria-Level 7 Categorical Mark and Grade
0,1,10,20,32,35,38% (F)
42,45,48% (D)
52,55,58% (C)
62,65,68% (B)
72, 75,78% (A)
82, 85, 88, 92, 95, 98, 100% (A+)
Pass status
Fail
Learning Outcomes have not been met
Marginal Fail
Learning Outcomes have not been met
Pass – Satisfactory
Learning Outcomes have been met
Pass – Good/Very Good
Learning Outcomes have been exceeded
Pass – Excellent
Learning Outcomes have been exceeded
Pass – Outstanding
Learning Outcomes have been exceeded
Criterion 1 (LO1)
This should include evidence of:
§ Concept of social impact and its relation to PH
§ Importance of social impact in PH (e.g., health equity, prevention, community engagement, policy advocacy etc.).
§ Examples of social impact in PH
§ Ways to increase social impact in PH
The portfolio demonstrates limited or no exploration of the value of social impact within society.
The infographic fails to convey information, data, and concepts related to social impact and its importance for public health.
No or few artefacts presented with no relevance to the learning outcome.
Disorganised with very limited or no references. Irrelevant sources for the arguments presented. Fails to meet brief requirements. Does not maintain confidentiality.
The portfolio demonstrates partial and inconsistently accurate exploration of the value of social impact within society.
The infographic contains limited information, data, and concepts related to social impact and its importance for public health.
Limited range of artefacts presented that lack clear connection to the learning outcome.
Poorly structured with basic references provided. Irrelevant or inappropriate sources for the arguments presented. Lacks adherence to the brief. Does not maintain confidentiality.
The portfolio demonstrates accurate but basic exploration of the value of social impact within society.
The infographic conveys accurate information, data, and concepts related to social impact and its importance for public health, but with limited depth.
Satisfactory range of artefacts presented that relate to the learning outcome.
Satisfactorily structured with references included but inconsistent; some irrelevant, most support arguments. Adheres to the brief. Maintains confidentiality.
The portfolio demonstrates accurate and detailed exploration of the value of social impact within society.
The infographic conveys clear and well-structured information, data, and concepts related to social impact and its significance for public health with appropriate depth.
Artefacts reflect good level of engagement with course material and the learning outcome.
Well-structured with sound organisation and clarity.
Good use of referencing, with appropriate source choices.
Adheres to the brief.
Maintains confidentiality.
The portfolio demonstrates accurate, detailed, and deep exploration of the value of social impact within society.
The infographic conveys information, data, and concepts related to social impact and its significance for public health with extended depth and breadth
Artefacts are of high quality, and demonstrate a high level of integration with the learning outcome.
Highly proficient, excellently organised, clear, and well-referenced with appropriate academic sources. Fully adheres to the brief. Maintains confidentiality.
The portfolio demonstrates systematic and thorough exploration of the value of social impact within society.
The infographic conveys information, data, and concepts related to social impact and its significance for public health with extended depth, breadth, and conceptual integration.
Exceptional artefacts and seamless integration with the learning outcome.
Exceptional presentation with flawless organisation, and exemplary referencing and use of academic sources. Exceeds all requirements of the brief. Maintains confidentiality.
Criterion 2 (LO2)
This should include evidence of:
§ Description and critique of a PH intervention plan and implementation (e.g., needs assessment, objectives, stakeholders etc.)
§ Role of innovation
§ Challenges with or without innovation
The portfolio demonstrates limited or no analysis of the need for innovation when leading PH projects.
The flowchart lacks key steps, and the portfolio does not include comments on innovation.
No or few artefacts presented with no relevance to the learning outcome.
Disorganised with very limited or no references. Irrelevant sources for the arguments presented. Fails to meet brief requirements. Does not maintain confidentiality.
The portfolio demonstrates partial and inconsistently accurate analysis of the need for innovation when leading PH projects.
The flowchart includes some steps and lacks details, and the portfolio contains insufficient commentary on innovation.
Limited range of artefacts presented that lack clear connection to the learning outcome.
Poorly structured with basic references provided. Irrelevant or inappropriate sources for the arguments presented. Lacks adherence to the brief. Does not maintain confidentiality.
The portfolio demonstrates accurate but basic analysis of the need for innovation when leading PH projects.
The flowchart provides basic steps with basic details, and the portfolio includes basic commentary on innovation.
Satisfactory range of artefacts presented that relate to the learning outcome.
Satisfactorily structured with references included but inconsistent; some irrelevant, most support arguments. Adheres to the brief. Maintains confidentiality.
The portfolio demonstrates accurate and detailed analysis of the need for innovation when leading PH projects.
The flowchart presents all steps, with clear, well-structured details, and the portfolio includes well-developed commentary on innovation.
Artefacts reflect good level of engagement with course material and the learning outcome.
Well-structured with sound organisation and clarity.
Good use of referencing, with appropriate source choices.
Adheres to the brief.
Maintains confidentiality.
The portfolio demonstrates accurate, detailed, and deep analysis of the need for innovation when leading PH projects.
The flowchart presents all steps, with clear, well-structured details, and the portfolio includes insightful commentary on innovation.
Artefacts are of high quality and demonstrate a high level of integration with the learning outcome.
Highly proficient, excellently organised, clear, and well-referenced with appropriate academic sources. Fully adheres to the brief. Maintains confidentiality.
The portfolio demonstrates systematic and thorough analysis of the need for innovation when leading PH projects.
The flowchart presents all steps, with clear, well-structured details, and the portfolio includes original insights on innovation.
Exceptional artefacts and seamless integration with the learning outcome.
Exceptional presentation with flawless organisation, and exemplary referencing and use of academic sources. Exceeds all requirements of the brief. Maintains confidentiality.
Criterion 3 (LO3)
This should include evidence of:
§ Presentation of an innovative idea for a PH concern
§ Description of plan
§ Contribution to improving PH and to broader societal benefits
§ Health outcomes to be measured
§ Ethical implications
The portfolio demonstrates limited or no ability to create and develop an innovative idea.
The proposal provides inaccurate, incomplete, or irrelevant content and does not present a coherent idea related to social impact.
No or few artefacts presented with no relevance to the learning outcome.
Disorganised with very limited or no references. Irrelevant sources for the arguments presented. Fails to meet brief requirements. Does not maintain confidentiality.
The portfolio demonstrates partial ability to create and develop an innovative idea.
The proposal presents a partially developed idea with limited accuracy or clarity and weak connection to social impact.
Limited range of artefacts presented that lack clear connection to the learning outcome.
Poorly structured with basic references provided. Irrelevant or inappropriate sources for the arguments presented. Lacks adherence to the brief. Does not maintain confidentiality.
The portfolio demonstrates basic ability to create and develop an innovative idea.
The proposal presents a clear idea with basic explanation of how it may contribute to social impact.
Satisfactory range of artefacts presented that relate to the learning outcome.
Satisfactorily structured with references included but inconsistent; some irrelevant, most support arguments. Adheres to the brief. Maintains confidentiality.
The portfolio demonstrates good ability to create and develop an innovative idea.
The proposal presents a well-developed idea with detailed explanation of how it could contribute to social impact.
Artefacts reflect good level of engagement with course material and the learning outcome.
Well-structured with sound organisation and clarity.
Good use of referencing, with appropriate source choices.
Adheres to the brief.
Maintains confidentiality.
The portfolio demonstrates excellent ability to create and develop an innovative idea.
The proposal presents a well-developed idea with analytical discussion of how it could generate social impact.
Artefacts are of high quality, and demonstrate a high level of integration with the learning outcome.
Highly proficient, excellently organised, clear, and well-referenced with appropriate academic sources. Fully adheres to the brief. Maintains confidentiality.
The portfolio demonstrates outstanding ability to create and develop an innovative idea.
The proposal showcases originality, depth, and a compelling vision for generating social impact.
Exceptional artefacts and seamless integration with the learning outcome.
Exceptional presentation with flawless organisation, and exemplary referencing and use of academic sources. Exceeds all requirements of the brief. Maintains confidentiality.
Criterion 4 (LO4)
This should include evidence of:
§ Depiction of personal development
§ Reflections on capacity to innovate.
The portfolio demonstrates limited or no ability to reflect on one’s own development as an innovator in PH.
The timeline does not present a coherent personal journey, and the portfolio does not provide meaningful reflection on growth.
No or few artefacts presented with no relevance to the learning outcome.
Disorganised with very limited or no references. Irrelevant sources for the arguments presented. Fails to meet brief requirements. Does not maintain confidentiality.
The portfolio demonstrates partial ability to reflect on one’s own development as an innovator in PH.
The timeline presents a partial or unclear personal journey, and the portfolio offers only limited and descriptive comments on growth.
Limited range of artefacts that lack clear connection to the learning outcome.
Poorly structured with basic references provided. Irrelevant or inappropriate sources for the arguments presented. Lacks adherence to the brief. Does not maintain confidentiality.
The portfolio demonstrates basic ability to reflect on one’s own development as an innovator in PH.
The timeline presents the personal journey with basic details, and the portfolio includes clear but descriptive reflections on growth.
Satisfactory range of artefacts that relate to the learning outcome.
Satisfactorily structured with references included, but inconsistent; some irrelevant, most support arguments. Adheres to the brief. Maintains confidentiality.
The portfolio demonstrates good ability to reflect on own development as an innovator in PH.
The timeline presents the personal journey clearly and with sufficient detail, and the portfolio includes reflections that identify specific learning moments and their relevance to growth.
Artefacts reflect good level of engagement with the course material and the learning outcome. Well-structured with sound organisation and clarity.
Good use of referencing, with appropriate source choices. Adheres to the brief. Maintains confidentiality.
The portfolio demonstrates excellent ability to reflect on one’s own development as an innovator in PH.
The timeline presents the personal journey with clarity and coherence, and the portfolio includes analytically developed reflections that explain how growth has occurred.
Artefacts are of high quality and demonstrate a high level of integration with the learning outcome.
Highly proficient, excellently organised, clear, and well-referenced with appropriate academic sources. Fully adheres to the brief. Maintains confidentiality.
The portfolio demonstrates outstanding ability to reflect on own development as an innovator in PH.
The timeline presents the personal journey, and the portfolio includes original and profound reflections on growth.
Exceptional artefacts and seamless integration with the learning outcome.
Exceptional presentation with flawless organisation, and exemplary referencing and use of academic sources. Exceeds all requirements of the brief. Maintains confidentiality.
Criterion 5 (Academic Skills)
This should include evidence of:
§ Writing, referencing, structure, and confidentiality
The portfolio is disorganised. No or minimal referencing. Does not meet the brief. Confidentiality not maintained.
The portfolio’s structure is unclear. Referencing is inconsistent or incomplete. Only partially meets the brief. Confidentiality breaches may be present.
The portfolio is structured. Referencing is present but inconsistent. Meets most brief’s requirements. Confidentiality maintained.
The portfolio is well-organised with coherent writing. Referencing is accurate. Brief is followed. Confidentiality maintained.
The portfolio’s structure and presentation are clear and coherent. Referencing is accurate and complete. Fully meets the brief. Confidentiality maintained.
The portfolio is highly organised and professionally presented. Referencing is precise and consistent. Exceeds expectations and adheres to all requirements,
