The purpose of this project is to demonstrate knowledge of change management, processes of change, and resistance to change. Using your readings and research, you will demonstrate how managers and leaders

Purpose

The purpose of this project is to demonstrate knowledge of change management, processes of change, and resistance to change. Using your readings and research, you will demonstrate how managers and leaders can influence change within an organization.

Task

Step 1: Read all the instructions provided here and review the rubric.

Step 2: Take the questionnaire:

https://leocontent.umgc.edu/content/dam/course-content/tgs/hrmd/hrmd-650/document/Change%20Leadership%20Competency%20Questionnaire%20HRMD%20650.xlsx?ou=1377691Think about your strengths and how you can use these competencies to overcome resistance to change and motivate others.

Step 3: Comprise a scholarly and professional presentation using PowerPoint, Prezi, or other presentation software that includes 5-7 slides (do not exceed 9 slides), include audio and ALL the following points:

Examine how key managers can use key elements of change to ensure effective change management processes.
Analyze the impact leaders have on the change process.
Using change management concepts, incorporate three to four competencies from your Change Leadership Competency Questionnaire results to address resistance to change.
Include a reference cited page. This assignment requires the use of, at minimum, 5 scholarly references or sources.
Include a detailed notes section for each slide. The notes section will be key speaking points with sources listed.

Submission

Read the grading rubric for the assignment.
- This assignment requires the use of, at minimum, five (5) scholarly references or sources dated within the last five years.
Follow the assignment guidelines to ensure that your final submission includes a title page slide, in-text citations, a summary/conclusion page, and a reference list.
- IMPORTANT NOTE: In-text citations should be included in the slides and notes, as appropriate, to support your key points and takeaways. All in-text citations must be included in the reference list
- Limit quotes; paraphrase to show greater understanding of the topics. When using quotes, provide the page and explain the significance of using the quote. Provide the page or paragraph number. Note that a reference within a reference list cannot exist without an associated in-text citation and vice versa.
The presentation must be professional in appearance and include visuals such as tables, graphs, and clipart.
- The slides should flow and transition in an organized manner with one idea/concept leading to the next.
- The presentation should begin with an introductory slide that clearly and succinctly explains what you intend to cover in the body of the presentation.
- The presentation should end with a conclusion/summary slide that clearly and succinctly explains what you covered in the body of the presentation.
- Include audio in your presentation that presents all the required material.
Submit a recorded presentation and the PowerPoint slides that include your notes.
You can use one of the options or another that you are familiar with.
- How to add and record audio in PowerPoint video
- Vimeo Presentation option
- Prezi Presentation option
Third-person writing is required. Third person means that there are no words such as “I,” “me,” “my,” “we,” or “us” (first person), nor is there use of “you” or “your” (second person). If you are uncertain how to write in the third person, view this link: First, Second, and Third Person.
Contractions are not used in business writing.

Due by Tuesday no later than 11:59 p.m. ET.

Criteria for Sucess

Carefully read the Presentation Assignment Rubric for the assignment.

References

Pope. G. (2011, January 20). First, second, and third person. Grammar Girl. https://www.quickanddirtytips.com/articles/first-second-and-third-person/

Microsoft. (n.d.). Microsoft PowerPoint add or delete audio [Video]. https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/add-and-record-audio-in-powerpoint-eeac1757-5f20-4379-95f2-0d0cd151d5b8#:~:text=Record%20audio-,Select%20Insert%20%3E%20Audio.,in%20order%20to%20record%20audio

Criteria	A	B	C	F	Criterion Score
Quality of Content	110 points Student demonstrated exceptional knowledge of relevant organizational development concepts and change theories in the recommended strategies to overcome resistance to change; all statements and opinions were supported by appropriate citations from the literature. 110 – 99 points	98 points Student demonstrated satisfactory knowledge of relevant concepts and theories in the recommended strategies to overcome resistance to change; most statements and opinions were supported by appropriate citations from the literature. 98 – 87 points	86 points Student demonstrated less than satisfactory knowledge of relevant concepts and theories or did not recommend three strategies to overcome resistance to change; some statements and opinions were not supported by appropriate citations from the literature. 86 – 76 points	75 points Student demonstrated unsatisfactory knowledge of relevant concepts and theories and did not recommend three strategies to overcome resistance to change; many statements and opinions were not supported by appropriate citations from the literature. 75 – 0 points	Score of Quality of Content, / 110
Quality of Research	40 points Student did an exceptional job of integrating course readings with additional research. Student cited more than the required number of references. Sources listed were all scholarly or practitioner journals from the last five years. 40 – 36 points	35 points Student did a satisfactory job of integrating course readings with additional research. Student cited the required number of references. Sources listed were primarily scholarly or practitioner journals from the last five years. 35 – 32 points	31 points Student did a less than satisfactory job of integrating course readings with additional research. Student may not have cited the required number of references. Some sources listed may not have been scholarly or practitioner journals from the last five years. 31 – 28 points	27 points Student did an inadequate job of integrating course readings with additional research. Student did not cite the required number of references. Many of the sources listed were not scholarly or practitioner journals from the last five years. 27 – 0 points	Score of Quality of Research, / 40
Organization and Mechanics	40 points Student presented information in a logical sequence that was very easy to follow. The presentation had no major spelling and/or grammar errors. The presentation audio was clear. The slide requirement was met. 40 – 36 points	35 points Student presented information in a mostly logical sequence that was fairly easy follow. The presentation had a few minor spelling and/or grammar errors. The presentation audio was clear. The slide requirement was met or may have been slightly exceeded. 35 – 32 points	31 points Student presented information in a confusing sequence that was not easy to follow. The presentation had several major spelling and/or grammar errors. The presentation had no recorded audio or the audio was not clear. The slide requirement may not have been met. 31 – 28 points	1 point Student presented information in an illogical sequence that was difficult to follow. The presentation had many spelling and/or grammar errors and did not include audio. The slide requirement was not met. 27 – 0 points	Score of Organization and Mechanics, / 40
Formatting	10 points All citations, quotations, and references were formatted correctly or contained only one or two minor errors. 10 – 9 points	8 points Most citations, quotations, and references were formatted correctly or contained a few minor errors. 8 points	7 points Several citations, quotations, and references were not formatted correctly or contained major errors. 7 points	6 points Many citations, quotations, and references were not formatted correctly or contained many errors. 6 – 0 points

Criteria

Criterion
Score

Quality of
Content

110 points

Student demonstrated exceptional
knowledge of relevant organizational development concepts and change theories
in the recommended strategies to overcome resistance to change; all
statements and opinions were supported by appropriate citations from the
literature.

110 – 99 points

98 points

Student demonstrated satisfactory
knowledge of relevant concepts and theories in the recommended strategies to
overcome resistance to change; most statements and opinions were supported by
appropriate citations from the literature.

98 – 87 points

86 points

Student demonstrated less than
satisfactory knowledge of relevant concepts and theories or did not recommend
three strategies to overcome resistance to change; some statements and
opinions were not supported by appropriate citations from the literature.

86 – 76 points

75 points

Student demonstrated unsatisfactory
knowledge of relevant concepts and theories and did not recommend three
strategies to overcome resistance to change; many statements and opinions
were not supported by appropriate citations from the literature.

75 – 0 points

Score of
Quality of Content,

/ 110

Quality of
Research

40 points

Student did an exceptional job of
integrating course readings with additional research. Student cited more than
the required number of references. Sources listed were all scholarly or
practitioner journals from the last five years.

40 – 36 points

35 points

Student did a satisfactory job of
integrating course readings with additional research. Student cited the
required number of references. Sources listed were primarily scholarly or
practitioner journals from the last five years.

35 – 32 points

31 points

Student did a less than satisfactory
job of integrating course readings with additional research. Student may not
have cited the required number of references. Some sources listed may not
have been scholarly or practitioner journals from the last five years.

31 – 28 points

27 points

Student did an inadequate job of
integrating course readings with additional research. Student did not cite
the required number of references. Many of the sources listed were not
scholarly or practitioner journals from the last five years.

27 – 0 points

Score of
Quality of Research,

/ 40

Organization
and Mechanics

40 points

Student presented information in a
logical sequence that was very easy to follow. The presentation had no
major spelling and/or grammar errors. The presentation audio was clear. The
slide requirement was met.

40 – 36 points

35 points

Student presented information in a
mostly logical sequence that was fairly easy follow. The presentation
had a few minor spelling and/or grammar errors. The presentation audio was
clear. The slide requirement was met or may have been slightly exceeded.

35 – 32 points

31 points

Student presented information in a
confusing sequence that was not easy to follow. The presentation had
several major spelling and/or grammar errors. The presentation had no
recorded audio or the audio was not clear. The slide requirement may not
have been met.

31 – 28 points

1 point

Student presented information in an
illogical sequence that was difficult to follow. The presentation had
many spelling and/or grammar errors and did not include audio. The slide
requirement was not met.

27 – 0 points

Score of
Organization and Mechanics,

/ 40

Formatting

10 points

All citations, quotations, and
references were formatted correctly or contained only one or two minor
errors.

10 – 9 points

8 points

Most citations, quotations, and
references were formatted correctly or contained a few minor errors.

8 points

7 points

Several citations, quotations, and
references were not formatted correctly or contained major errors.

7 points

6 points

Many citations, quotations, and
references were not formatted correctly or contained many errors.

6 – 0 points