The importance of sustainability in the hospitality industry cannot be overstated. As our world grapples with climate change and resource depletion, the industry’s ecological footprint has come under scrutiny. The rapid expansion of hotels and resorts, coupled with the resource-intensive nature of the industry, has led to
environmental degradation, such as water wastage, energy consumption and waste generation. Sustainable hospitality practices offer a way to mitigate these impacts, providing a responsible and ethical approach to tourism.
The overall aim of this unit is to introduce students to the essential principles of sustainability in hospitality, which organisations are increasingly making a priority as part of their environmental strategy. Students will consider the impact of sustainable business on communities, and the steps necessary to develop sustainability strategies within organisations. They will also have the opportunity to investigate in more detail the role of sustainability practitioners, who are responsible for leading projects, and to work closely with a variety of stakeholders and partners.
On successful completion of this unit, students will be able to understand economic theories on sustainable development in organisations and make use of different tools available to identify sustainable themes/partners for developing relevant strategies.
Students will be equipped with the knowledge and skills required to progress into roles in the sector and/or higher levels of study.
Learning Outcomes
By the end of this unit a student will be able to:
LO1 Explain the impact of sustainability principles for hospitality organisations
LO2 Discuss the characteristics of sustainability and corporate social responsibility
LO3 Identify operational risks and benefits of sustainability in the hospitality industry
LO4 Present a business case for adopting sustainable hospitality practices to meet business objectives
Assignment Title: The influence of sustainability on the Hospitality industry.
|
Task A Submission |
|
This submission will be in the form of an The recommended length of this submission is Where appropriate, learning theory and |
|
Unit Learning Outcomes |
|
LO1: Explain the impact of sustainability principles for hospitality LO2: Discuss the characteristics of sustainability and corporate social |
|
Scenario & Activity |
|
You have been appointed as a The role of a Sustainability You have been asked to produce a You must therefore prepare a Begin by defining the concept of You will need to consider how |
|
Task B: Submission Format Group Academic Poster |
|
This submission will be in the form of a Group You will have to create several posters to After This reflection must be included at the end of the report before You are required to participate in a 15-minute |
|
Unit Learning Outcomes |
|
LO3: Identify operational risks and benefits of sustainability in the LO4 Present a business case for adopting sustainable hospitality practices |
|
Scenario and Activity: |
|
In your role as Sustainability First set of posters – a proposal Create a proposal to senior Reference the role of analytical You should then introduce your Second set of posters – Business Pitch a formal business case Outline options for integrating |
|
Learning Outcomes and Assessment Criteria |
||
|
Pass |
Merit |
Distinction |
|
LO1 Explain the impact of sustainability principles for hospitality |
LO1 and LO2 D1 Evaluate the impact of sustainability
|
|
|
P1 Explain features of sustainability principles |
M1 Compare how hospitality businesses engage |
|
|
LO2 Discuss the characteristics of sustainability |
||
|
P2 Discuss the characteristics of sustainability and corporate social P3 Explain the role of the United Nations on sustainability and |
M2 Analyse how hospitality businesses can engage |
|
|
LO3 Identify operational |
LO3 and LO4 D2 Make suitable recommendations that consider
|
|
|
P4 Discuss |
M3 Evaluate the impact of operational risks and |
|
|
LO4 Present a business case for adopting sustainable hospitality |
||
|
P5 Present a business case outline with options P6 Present a business case summary that |
M4 Prepare a business case to achieve sustainable |
|
|
Achievement of a Pass grade
A student must have satisfied all the Pass criteria for the learning outcomes, showing coverage of the unit content and therefore attainment at Level 4 or 5 of the national framework.
Achievement of a Merit grade
A student must have satisfied all the Merit criteria (as well as the Pass criteria) through high performance in each learning outcome.
Achievement of a Distinction grade
A student must have satisfied all the Distinction criteria (as well as the Pass and Merit criteria), and these define outstanding performance across the unit as a whole.
ALL GRADES ARE PROVISIONAL UNTIL INTERNALLY VERIFIED AND UNTIL EXTERNALLY CERTIFIED BY EDEXCEL.
THIS MEANS THAT A GRADE CAN BE CHANGED AT ANY POINT UNTIL EDEXCEL CERTIFIES IT
As per Pearson policy, you are only allowed two submissions per module. One for final submission and another one for referral. Failure to achieve a grade pass after a second submission will result in you having to repeat the module in the next term.
Any re-submission or late submission (unless authorised due to mitigating circumstances) will be capped at a PASS grade only.
|
● Present your work in one business report style which should include a cover page, table of contents, introduction, conclusion, reference list, foot or end notes and appendices if any
● Include the reference code of this assignment on your assignment submission front page.
● Sign the Learner’s Statement of authenticity in the cover page. Failure to do so will result in the submission being declined.
● Ensure the following information is in the footer on every page:
o Your name
o The production date of your submission
o The code number of your assignment brief
o The page number (Each page must be numbered at the bottom right-hand side)
● Spell-check the document and make sure there are no grammatical errors as it may result in the submission being declined.
● Complete all the tasks in a Holistic manner as set in the brief and without separating the assessment criteria to avoid a potential referral.
● Create your own titles and sub-headings to structure the work without copying the assessment criteria verbatim.
● Produce clear, specific reasoning and arguments in support of your answers.
● Submit your work in a single Word-processed document of not more than 5000 words for all learning Outcomes. This word limit is only for guidelines and is not applied to grading. PDF and other types of files are not accepted.
● You must include a bibliography at the end to show where your information was sourced. Failure to do so may result in the submission being declined
● Your sources must be identified using the Harvard referencing system. The words used in your bibliography will not be included in your word count.
● You must use Arial, size 12, 1.5-line spacing and black to format the text.
To access any feedback (formative/summative) you will have to access Moodle and open your assignment. You will have to click on the blue comment box in the right hand side and the feedback will appear within the text. You might have to click on the blue bubbles to see the feedback.
|
If an extension is necessary for a valid reason, requests must be made in writing using a course work extension request form to the head of department. Please note that the lecturers do not have the authority to extend the coursework deadlines and therefore do not ask them to award a coursework extension.
The completed form must be accompanied by evidence such as a medical certificate in the event of you being sick.
|
Any act of plagiarism and collusion will be seriously dealt with according to the regulations and MRC Malpractice policy
‘Plagiarism occurs when a student misrepresents any work submitted as his/her own work, the work of any other person or of any institution. Examples of forms of plagiarism include:
● the verbatim (word for word) copying of another’s work without appropriate and correctly presented acknowledgement.
● the close paraphrasing of another’s work by simply changing a few words or altering the order of presentation, without appropriate and correctly presented acknowledgement.
● unacknowledged quotation of phrases from another’s work;
● The deliberate and detailed presentation of another’s concept as one’s own.’
All types of work submitted by students are covered by this definition, including, written work, diagrams, designs, engineering drawings and pictures.
‘Collusion occurs when, unless with official approval (e.g., in the case of group projects), two or more students consciously collaborate in the preparation and production of work which is ultimately submitted by each in an identical, or substantially similar, form and/or is represented by each to be the product of his or her individual efforts.
All submissions for assessment must be submitted on Moodle to generate a Turnitin Report on similarity to detect potential plagiarism and collusion.
The maximum Turnitin score admissible is 15% but a submission can be classified as plagiarism and/or collusion with a lower score depending on the size of the submission and size of the text highlighted.
Assignments with plagiarism/ad or collusion will be automatically referred for reworking and resubmission. Please check the MRC Assessment policy as well as MRC Malpractice policy for details of the potential penalties as a procedure.
Including pictures of text (apart from the cover page or table of content) or pictures of any other type of information (diagram for example) without a citation and a Harvard Reference could be deemed to be an attempt of malpractice and could trigger an automatic referral as well as a malpractice procedure.
Any student might be called to seat through a viva with the lecturer to confirm any parts of the submission through an interview which will then form part of the summative assessment.
|
AI tools have proliferated and become more common and as a result, their usage for research has increased which prompted change of government policies in this matter.
Overall, it remains too easy for students to misunderstand how they can use Generative Artificial Intelligence tools and unintentionally breach academic integrity guidelines.
Research of information and the writing of academic work must always be performed by the student, and while it is acceptable to use an AI tool to start a research process, it is not allowed to use it to write a submission in your place.
The important part is to understand that the best way to produce a work is to research it through traditional methods (books articles, websites, journals).
Yet, AI tools could be used to help with the research but only as a starting point. Having found information, thanks to an AI tool, about a topic you are writing about, you should then research it using these traditional methods and include the references and citations based on these resources in your work.
Once you have the correct information, you need to write the assignment yourself, using an AI tool to do this for you is never allowed. The usage of paraphrasing tools might be appropriate to find alternative to some words and short sentences, but not or a whole paragraph/page/ work.
The same way Mont Rose College is using a similarity detection system, an AI detection tool is embedded in our systems and every submission you make will go through both of them.
Submissions for assessment that consist of large substantially unmodified output from Artificial Intelligence software may be considered as a very poor academic practice as it does not represent the student’s own work.
To this effect, the limit on AI detection has been set at 40%. If a submission is over that allowance, the grade will be suspended and the student called to sit through a viva with the lecturer and academic team to discuss the AI score as well as any parts of the submission through an interview which will then form part of the summative assessment.
In cases where an individual persistently exhibits poor academic practice through inappropriate use of Artificial Intelligence tools, such as a lack of evidencing their use of the tools, they may be referred to the academic misconduct procedures and the range of the potential penalties.