Assessment1_portfolio
Submission date:
This Week (UTC+1000)
Submission ID:
NIL
File name:
ParmarK_TCHR5010_assessment1_portfolio.docx (32.14K)
Word count:
2266
Character count:
13761
Write aut 4hor name in full in the first instance
Vocabulary
Links to unit text missing
Assessment1_portfolio
ORIGINALITY REPORT
PRIMARY SOURCES
Submitted to Southern Cross University
Student Paper
Submitted to Ikon Institute
Student Paper
Submitted to University of Edinburgh
Student Paper
Submitted to University of Western Sydney
Student Paper
Submitted to Southern Cross EducationInstitute
Student Paper
Submitted to University of Kentucky
Student Paper
Submitted to Macquarie University
Student Paper
rgsa.openaccesspublications.org
Internet Source
Submitted to South African College of AppliedPsychology
Student Paper
Submitted to University of Hull
Student Paper
Submitted to University of Keele
Student Paper
znp.udpu.edu.ua
Internet Source
13
1
%
14
<
1
%
Exclude quotes
Off
Exclude bibliography
Off
Exclude assignmenttemplate
On
Exclude matches
Off
link.springer.com
Internet Source
www.coursehero.com
Internet Source
FINAL GRADE
32
/50
Assessment1_portfolio
GRADEMARK REPORT
GENERAL COMMENTS
Dear Khushi,
Thank you for submitting TCHR5010 Task 1
Please review the feedback below whichaddresses the marking rubric for the task.
C1:
Yourphilosophy provides a basic discussion of the required focus areas and demonstratessome understanding of early childhood education principles. There are generallinks to unit content, though critical refl ection is limited. To improve,extend your discussion by critically engaging with theories and unit concepts,and off er more detailed refl ections on each focus area.
C2:
Yourgoals are strong, clear, and appropriate for professional preschool placement.They refl ect good insight into the preschool context and support professionalgrowth. To further improve, consider refi ning your goals to be even moreambitious and align them closely with current best practice frameworks like theEYLF and NQS.
C3:
Yourcritical refl ection shows a sound understanding of the goals and associatedchallenges. Strategies for overcoming challenges are appropriate but could befurther developed. Some links to theory and frameworks are evident. To improve,deepen your analysis by critically examining each strategy and drawing strongerlinks to relevant theories and professional standards.
QM
C4:
Youracademic writing is clear and generally correct, with mostly accurate APAreferencing. Minor formatting errors are present but do not majorly detractfrom the clarity of the work. Word count is appropriate. To improve, addressthe small inconsistencies in APA formatting and work toward greater consistencyand accuracy throughout your referencing. Ensure that your sources are credible and relevant to the topic area for strength.
Kind regards,
Kelly P
PAGE 1
PAGE 2
Comment 1
Using the sentence starters from the unit tutorials would have been a good idea
Comment 2
This needs further expansion or some links to literature
Comment 3
This would benefi t from expansion
Write author name in full in the first instance
Write the author name in full in the fi rst time you introduce them with the acronym following insquare brackets – you can then use the acronym moving forward
Comment 4
Connecting to the Principle of Equity, Inclusion and High Expectations may have also added strength
Comment 5
Being more specifi c e.g, (6.1.2) would have added further strength.
Comment 6
QM
QM
QM
QM
QM
good connection
Links to literature needed
PAGE 3
Comment 7
Further integration of the literature would have added depth.
Comment 8
Meaning unclear
Comment 9
Meaning unclear
Comment 10
citation
Comment 11
This would benefi t from further unpacking for clarity
Be specific (author/year)
Comment 12
Can you be more specifi c? Which QA?
Comment 13
Links to literature would have added strength
Be specific (author/year)
PAGE 4
Comment 14
Good that you have linked to the age group
Vocabulary
Ensure you are using the correct vocabulary / terminology e.g., kid = child
Links to unit text missing
You do not appear to have made links to the unit text. This was a key requirement of the task.Please ensure that you read the task brief carefully.
Comment 15
?
PAGE 5
QM
QM
QM
QM
QM
QM
QM
QM
QM
QM
Links to literature needed
Comment 16
More expansion needed
Avoid contractions
Links to literature needed
PAGE 6
Links to literature needed
Comment 17
Try to be specifi c (6.2.1 – Transitions)
Strikethrough.
Links to literature needed
Comment 19
Relevance of source
PAGE 7
Links to literature needed
Strikethrough.
Links to unit text missing
You do not appear to have made links to the unit text. This was a key requirement of the task.Please ensure that you read the task brief carefully.
PAGE 8
Referencing curriculum documents
Education curriculum resources – APA 7th Referencing Guide – Library guides at Southern CrossUniversity
Reference list: Write author in full
Do not use the abbreviated form of the author in reference lists, write the author in full.
Text Comment.
J
Strikethrough.
Reference list: Paywall
This source is behind a paywall. You cannot use a source to support your academic writing ifyou have only read the abstract, you must read the source in full. This is an academic integrityissue.
QM
Comment 22
Relevance to EC as this focuses on clinical practice
Comment 23
Relevance to EC? This focuses on the transition from primary to secondary school
Reference list: Paywall
This source is behind a paywall. You cannot use a source to support your academic writing ifyou have only read the abstract, you must read the source in full. This is an academic integrityissue.
PAGE 9
RUBRIC: TCHR5010 ASSESSMENT 1 2025
CRITERION 1 (30%)
HIGH DISTINCTION +
(100)
HIGH DISTINCTION
(92)
DISTINCTION
(79)
CREDIT
(69)
PASS
(57)
MARGINAL FAIL
(42)
FAIL
(17)
NOT ATTEMPTED
(0)
CRITERION 2 (30%)
HIGH DISTINCTION +
(100)
HIGH DISTINCTION
(92)
DISTINCTION
(79)
CREDIT
(69)
PASS
(57)
MARGINAL FAIL
(42)
FAIL
(17)
NOT ATTEMPTED
(0)
CRITERION 3 (25%)
HIGH DISTINCTION +
(100)
63.60 / 100
57 / 100
Professional Philosophy Clarity, coherence, and critical engagement with 4 important aspects (e.g.,relationships, quality, diversity, inclusion, transition, pro-social development)
Outstanding articulation of philosophy with deep critical insight and seamlessintegration of unit themes
Clear, coherent, and critically informed philosophy with excellent integration of unitthemes
Well-structured philosophy with good critical thought and integration of key ideas
Sound articulation with some critical engagement; mostly integrates key concepts
Basic articulation with limited depth; concepts addressed but not well developed
Superfi cial or vague ideas with limited reference to unit content
Philosophy poorly expressed or largely off -topic
Not attempted or entirely missing
69 / 100
Goal Setting & Relevance Quality, clarity, and relevance of goals for professional placement; alignment withpreschool context
Goals are highly relevant, specifi c, measurable, and show exceptional insight intoprofessional growth
Goals are clear, appropriate, and refl ect a strong understanding of professionalcontext
Goals are appropriate and well considered; refl ect good understanding of preschoolsettings
Goals show some relevance and understanding; partially developed
Goals are simplistic or general but meet basic expectations
Goals lack clarity, relevance, or understanding of professional placement
Goals are inappropriate or absent of educational context
Not addressed or omitted entirely
69 / 100
Critical Refl ection & challenges. Depth of critical refl ection on each goal; identifi cation and analysis ofchallenges and responses
Exceptional depth of critical refl ection; insightful and proactive strategies clearlylinked to literature and frameworks
HIGH DISTINCTION
(92)
DISTINCTION
(79)
CREDIT
(69)
PASS
(57)
MARGINAL FAIL
(42)
FAIL
(17)
NOT ATTEMPTED
(0)
CRITERION 4 (15%)
HIGH DISTINCTION +
(100)
HIGH DISTINCTION
(92)
DISTINCTION
(79)
CREDIT
(69)
PASS
(57)
MARGINAL FAIL
(42)
FAIL
(17)
NOT ATTEMPTED
(0)
Thorough refl ection and realistic strategies; strong use of references and frameworklinks
Good critical thought and logical responses; appropriate references used
Adequate refl ection: challenge resolution lacks some detail; limited referenceintegration
Some refl ection present but minimal depth; weak link to frameworks/literature
Incomplete refl ection; minimal understanding of challenges or solutions
Very limited or fl awed refl ection; no clear resolution strategies
No refl ection or response to goals/challenges present
57 / 100
including correct word count, correct writing conventions, use of professional language and academicreferencing (APA 7th style). A minimum of 8 academic references included
Flawless use of academic writing conventions and APA referencing with acomprehensive range of high-quality, authoritative sources. All references areaccurately formatted and seamlessly integrated into the content. Word count within+/- 10% of the set word count.
Accurate academic writing and APA referencing with a strong range of relevantsources. Very minor formatting errors may be present. Word count within +/- 10% ofthe set word count.
Good academic writing and APA referencing with a range of appropriate sources,though there may be some errors or inconsistencies in formatting. Word count within+/- 10% of the set word count.
Adequate academic writing and referencing with some relevant sources. Some minorand inconsistent errors with formatting. Word count within +/- 10% of the set wordcount.
Basic academic writing and referencing with limited sources. Some errors andinconsistencies with formatting. Word count within +/- 10% of the set word count.
Poor standard of academic writing and referencing with consistent errors in most/allareas Word count signifi cantly under or over +/- 10% of the set word count for thetask
Signifi cant improvement needed in academic writing and referencing. Referencing isabsent, incorrect, or irrelevant
Not attempted
The post Assessment 1 appeared first on Universal Assignment.
