Using the Internet, find a sport law-related story in which Contract Law played a role. In MS Word, type a review of the article (i.e., what happened), and discuss the legal principles involved. Finally, give your thoughts on the story/article as well as your opinion.
Case Review: O’Brien v. Ohio State University (2012)
What Happened
Jim O’Brien, the former head coach of Ohio State University’s men’s basketball team, was fired in 2004 after admitting he had loaned $6,000 to a recruit’s family, violating NCAA rules. O’Brien sued the university for wrongful termination, arguing that his employment contract only allowed termination “for cause” under specific circumstances. The case went to trial, and in 2012 the Ohio Court of Appeals upheld a lower court’s ruling that Ohio State had breached O’Brien’s contract. The court found that while O’Brien violated NCAA rules, the infraction did not rise to the level of “material breach” required to justify termination under the contract. O’Brien was awarded damages exceeding $2 million.
Legal Principles Involved
This case illustrates several key Contract Law principles:
Material Breach: Not all breaches justify termination. The court distinguished between minor violations and breaches that fundamentally undermine the contract.
For Cause Termination: Employment contracts often specify conditions under which termination is permissible. Ohio State failed to prove O’Brien’s violation met the contractual threshold.
Damages: When a contract is breached, courts may award damages to compensate the injured party. O’Brien received compensation for lost salary and benefits.
Good Faith and Fair Dealing: Contracts imply that both parties must act fairly. The court found Ohio State acted prematurely in firing O’Brien without sufficient contractual justification.
My Thoughts and Opinion
This case highlights the tension between sports governance (NCAA rules) and contractual obligations. While O’Brien clearly violated NCAA regulations, the court emphasized that contractual language governs employment relationships. Ohio State’s failure to align its contract terms with NCAA compliance standards left it vulnerable.
In my opinion, the ruling underscores the importance of precise contract drafting in sports. Universities and teams must ensure employment contracts explicitly address regulatory compliance as grounds for termination. Otherwise, institutions risk costly litigation.
This case also demonstrates how courts prioritize contractual obligations over external rules. For athletes, coaches, and organizations, it is a reminder that contracts are binding legal instruments, and vague or incomplete terms can lead to unintended consequences.
