Prior to beginning work on this discussion forum, read the Trading Places: Examining Leadership Competencies Between For-Profit vs. Public and Non-Profit LeadersDownload Tradi
3 min read Prior to beginning work on this discussion forum, read
the Trading Places: Examining Leadership Competencies Between For-Profit vs. Public and Non-Profit LeadersDownload Trading Places: Examining Leadership Competencies Between For-Profit vs. Public and Non-Profit Leaders article Write In a doctorate program focused on leadership, your work is not just about gaining knowledge; it is about becoming a leader whose actions, communication, and presence consistently reflect credibility, ethics, and influence. Your professional and scholarly identity will be built through your actions and ideas across every setting in which you are present. Professionalism goes beyond etiquette, making deadlines, or meeting minimum expectations; you are intentionally shaping how others experience you as a leader–scholar. As a scholar–practitioner, when it comes to professionalism, it is important to look at leadership presence, your leadership values, and your conduct when it comes to feedback and conflict.
When you look at professionalism, every interaction you have, such as a synchronous session, discussion post, or email with your professor, becomes an impression on how others perceive your competence, respect, and readiness to lead. Your leadership values help you to influence what you focus on and your approach to how you interact with others. Finally, as a leader, you engage with critique to not only help strengthen ideas but also build relationships and trust with your peers. Much of what you do in this program is asynchronous, so it is important to understand how tone and professionalism are relayed and interpreted both in online activities as well as in-person activities. The ability to give, receive, and respond to feedback professionally, even if you disagree with it, is essential to success as a scholar–practitioner in leadership.
In this week’s discussion post, you will consider how your interactions with your peers form your scholar–practitioner identity.
Please respond to the following prompts:
Define professionalism from your point of view and how that definition aligns with your view of what you want to be as your professional doctoral identity. Do not use a definition you find in the literature; create the definition from your own experience. Discuss a professionalism success, either something you did or something you witnessed, in an academic or professional online setting (e.g., email, discussion post). Assess what made the situation successful and support your assessment with scholarly literature. Create a rule of thumb professionals should follow to demonstrate professionalism, based on the situation you presented. Following is an example. Please do not use the example as your rule of thumb. For example: Treat everyone with respect. Discuss a professionalism misstep, either something you did or something you witnessed, in an academic or professional face-to-face setting. Assess what the misstep was in this scenario and support your assessment with scholarly literature. Create another rule of thumb professionals should follow to demonstrate professionalism, based on the situation you presented. Describe how you would handle a situation where you received feedback from an instructor or manager that you did not agree with. Create a question
